Collingswood Boro NJ property tax rate 2025: 2.231
Collingswood Boro, Camden County. 4,578 parcels in the MOD-IV 2026 file. Rate shown is tax year 2025 (latest available — not yet matched to assessment year).
Assessments are tax year 2026; latest published general rate we have is 2025. Estimate uses that rate until the 2026 rate is loaded.
How to read a Collingswood Boro bill
Collingswood Boro’s general rate of 2.231 is tax year 2025 on the 2026 assessment file. It is not a 2026 bill. The prior general rate on file is 3.879 for 2024. School, county, and municipal shares of this rate are 48.9%, 23.3%, and 27.9%. The largest slice is schools. In Camden County the middle school share for rate year 2025 is 49.0% in Waterford Twp. Class 2 net assessments changed from $1,786,908,000 to $1,778,716,700, down 0.5%, on 3,969 parcels. Usable sales with a 2025 deed: median $415,500 (146 sales). The largest class share of net assessed value is Residential at 71.1%. State school aid is outside these bars.
Collingswood Boro at a glance
4,578 parcels are on the 2026 file. The 2025 general rate is 2.231, and the prior rate on file is 3.879 for 2024. A typical class 2 assessment is $448,152. Usable sales with a 2025 deed: 146, median $415,500. The state construction file lists 1,577 permits here. The median class 2 house was built in 1925. The Census Bureau’s 2019–2023 American Community Survey counts 14,163 people and 7,009 housing units in Collingswood borough. A property page adds that parcel’s permits, flood zone, mapped flood elevation, and high and low ground. It also says what soil the state mapped, whether the 2012 map shows a wetland, and whether the address is in the Pinelands, the Highlands, or the coastal zone. It names a historic district only when the address is inside one. Owner names are not shown.
The shape of the ground in Collingswood Boro
Collingswood Boro sits on the state’s 10-foot ground scan, from LiDAR flown between 2014 and 2019. The Camden County page opens that scan as a hillshade you can pan and zoom. Darker cuts are lower. Lighter ground is higher. A property page in Collingswood Boro opens the same scan on that address. The lowest and highest 10-foot cell stay as numbers. The picture does not mark those two cells. It is not a survey and not a slope in degrees.
Building permits in Collingswood Boro
The New Jersey construction-permit file lists 1,577 permits in Collingswood Boro. This file is a full record from 2021 on. Older permits are mostly missing. Work from before then can be missing here and still be at the Collingswood Boro construction office.
2025 general tax rate in Collingswood Boro: 2.231
This general rate is tax year 2025. The assessment file is 2026. It is not a 2026 bill.
In Camden County, the median municipality’s school share (rate year 2025) is 49.0%; this town is 48.9%. The largest slice here is schools. State school aid is not in these bars — it reduces the school levy before the rate is struck. All Camden towns · How NJ taxes work.
The school percent is the local property-tax levy. The district for this municipality is Collingswood Boro (K-12), FY2027 K–12 aid $10,613,909. Those aid figures are not slices of these bars. Camden district table.
Prior year (2024) general rate: 3.879.
Tax on a $200,000 or $500,000 sale in Collingswood Boro
These figures use Collingswood Boro’s own ratio and general rate. How the same sale price is calculated for every town. This is not an appraisal and not a collector bill.
2025
A $500,000 sale at the 2025 ratio of 63.64% would be assessed at about $318,200. At the general rate of 2.231, the estimated tax is $7,099. A $200,000 sale at that same ratio and rate would be assessed at about $127,280, with an estimated tax of $2,840.
In Camden County for 2025, the $500,000 bill runs from $6,621 in Pennsauken Twp to $34,552 in Audubon Park Boro. The middle bill is $14,509 in Bellmawr Boro. All Camden towns.
See every New Jersey town on the same $200,000 and $500,000 sale for 2025.
Recent usable sales in Collingswood Boro
These are the five newest usable deeds on the 2026 file for Collingswood Boro. A $1 deed and a non-usable SR1A sale are left out. Each parcel stores one sale, so this is not every deed recorded in town.
| Address | Deed date | Sale price | Net assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 WOODLAWN AVE | 11/24/2025 | $390,000 | $373,600 |
| 705 CENTER ST | 11/24/2025 | $515,000 | $503,200 |
| 6 W SUMMERFIELD AVE | 11/21/2025 | $360,000 | $333,700 |
| 465 PARK AVE | 11/14/2025 | $720,000 | $709,600 |
| 400 VIRGINIA AVE | 11/14/2025 | $707,000 | $628,600 |
Owner names are not shown. The rate year and the assessment file year differ, so this table does not print an estimated tax. This is not a collector’s bill.
Highest estimated tax in Collingswood Boro, 2025 rate: $25,815
Residential
The highest residential estimate in Collingswood Boro is $25,815 at 1 CRESTMONT LANE, on a net assessment of $1,157,100 and a 2025 general rate of 2.231.
| Address | Class | Net assessment | Rate year | Estimated tax |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 CRESTMONT LANE | 2 — Residential (four families or less) | $1,157,100 | 2025 | $25,815 |
| 419 VIRGINIA AVE | 2 — Residential (four families or less) | $1,153,400 | 2025 | $25,732 |
| 549 GRANT AVE | 2 — Residential (four families or less) | $1,129,000 | 2025 | $25,188 |
| 825 COLFORD AVE | 2 — Residential (four families or less) | $1,034,800 | 2025 | $23,086 |
| 501 COLLINGS AVE | 2 — Residential (four families or less) | $1,032,200 | 2025 | $23,028 |
Business
The highest business estimate in Collingswood Boro is $133,458 at 50 FERRY AVE, on a net assessment of $5,982,000 and a 2025 general rate of 2.231.
| Address | Class | Net assessment | Rate year | Estimated tax |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 FERRY AVE | 4A — Commercial | $5,982,000 | 2025 | $133,458 |
| 588 HADDON AVE | 4A — Commercial | $4,184,200 | 2025 | $93,350 |
| 30 WHITE HORSE PIKE | 4A — Commercial | $3,695,000 | 2025 | $82,435 |
| 664-668 HADDON AVE | 4A — Commercial | $3,628,200 | 2025 | $80,945 |
| 801 HADDON AVE | 4A — Commercial | $3,278,000 | 2025 | $73,132 |
Owner names are not shown. Every parcel in this town uses the same rate, so the highest tax is the highest assessment. Commercial and industrial parcels (class 4A and 4B) are the business list. Apartment buildings are class 4C and are not in that list. This is not a collector’s bill.
Ratable base in Collingswood Boro, typical class 2 assessment $448,152
Class 2 residential in the MOD-IV file: 3,969 parcels, average net assessment $448,152.
How assessments changed
Class 2 residential net assessments changed from $1,786,908,000 to $1,778,716,700, down 0.5%, on 3,969 parcels that have both a prior net and a 2026 net. This is the assessment roll, not an appraisal.
Among 146 usable recorded sales whose latest deed on this file is in 2025, the median price is $415,500. A $1 deed and a non-usable SR1A sale are left out. Each parcel stores one sale, so this is not every deed recorded that year.
Share of net assessed value by property class (MOD-IV). Not a school-quality rating.
| Class | Parcels | Net assessed | % of net |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential 2 | 3,969 | $1,778,716,700 | 71.1% |
| Vacant land 1 | 273 | $456,097,000 | 18.2% |
| Commercial 4A | 294 | $175,790,900 | 7.0% |
| Apartment 4C | 40 | $91,160,000 | 3.6% |
| Other / unclassified other | 2 | $66,001 | 0.0% |
Housing stock in Collingswood Boro, median year built 1925
On the 2026 file, class 2 houses in Collingswood Boro with a year built have a median year of 1925, about 101 years old. Of those 3,958 houses, the largest share was built Before 1940. This is the assessor’s year built. It is not a ranking of towns.
By parcel count, Residential 86.7%, Commercial 6.4%, Vacant land 6.0%, Apartment 0.9%, Other / unclassified <0.1%. Those percentages are a count of parcels, not a share of tax dollars. The class table uses the tax-base share.
Year built
Assessor building line
Grouped from the assessor’s building abbreviation. One-family, two-family, and condo are the codes that read clearly. Other codes stay in their own group. This is not a bedroom count, and square feet are left off because most records do not include them.